Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Time Course: Evidence for a Cross-titration Trap
Lochmann van Bennekom MWH, Gijsman HJ, IntHout J, Verkes RJ. Antipsychotic Polypharmacy in Time Course: Evidence for a Cross-titration Trap. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2024 Oct 19. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001916. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39423305.
View on PubMed ↗
Purpose/background: Antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) is controversial yet applied in 20% of patients with psychotic disorders. We investigated indications for initiating and continuing APP, including the contribution of unfinished cross-titrations. Methods/procedures: This 2-month study was part of a prospective study to reduce inappropriate APP in inpatients. With each new prescription resulting in APP, we asked the prescriber for the indication (eg, switching antipsychotics, sedation for agitation/sleep disorders, treatment refractoriness, other) and repeated this at 30 and 60 days. Secondary outcome was unfinished cross-titration at 60 days. Findings/results: In a consecutive cohort of 55 patients, 80% diagnosed with schizophrenia, switching antipsychotics was the primary initial indication for APP in 31 of 55 patients (56%), followed by sedation in 12 of 55 patients (22%), and treatment refractoriness in 10 of 55 patients (18%). Overall, APP was discontinued after 30 days in 25 of 55 patients (45%) and after 60 days in 28 of 55 patients (51%). At 60 days, APP initiated for switching antipsychotics was ongoing in 9 of 31 patients (29%), APP initiated for sedation was ongoing in 8 of 12 patients (66%), and APP initiated for refractoriness was ongoing in 9 of 10 patients (90%). The initial indication for APP was maintained at 60 days in 21 of 27 patients (78%). Unfinished cross-titration occurred in 9 of 31 patients (29%) with APP initiated for switching antipsychotics. Implications/conclusions: APP was initiated primarily because of cross-titration switching of antipsychotics. The reason for APP was generally maintained consistently over time, particularly when initiated for treatment refractoriness. Of all patients with APP initiated to switch antipsychotics, 29% ended in unfinished cross-titration.
Bottom line: Nearly one-third of antipsychotic switches result in unfinished cross-titrations, creating a "cross-titration trap" where patients remain on inappropriate polypharmacy long-term.
Why it matters: This study reveals that most antipsychotic polypharmacy starts during medication switches rather than for refractory illness, and clinicians should implement systematic protocols to complete cross-titrations and avoid inadvertent long-term polypharmacy.
⚠ Small single-center study with only 55 patients over 60 days may not capture longer-term polypharmacy patterns or generalize to outpatient settings.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Glucagon-like peptide agonists for weight management in antipsychotic-induced weight gain: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Bak M, Campforts B, Domen P, van Amelsvoort T, Drukker M. Glucagon-like peptide agonists for weight management in antipsychotic-induced weight gain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2024 Dec;150(6):516-529. doi: 10.1111/acps.13734. Epub 2024 Jul 24. PMID: 39048532.
View on PubMed ↗
Introduction: Managing body weight in patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) is challenging. Besides lifestyle interventions, pharmacological interventions may contribute to weight loss. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effect on weight loss and adverse effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists in patients with AIWG. Materials and methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, we performed a meta-analysis of blinded and open-label randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies that evaluated treatment with GLP-1 in patients with AIWG, regardless of psychiatric diagnosis. PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Primary outcome measures were changes in body weight and BMI. Secondary outcomes were changes in adverse effects and severity of psychopathology due to GLP-1 agonists. Results: Only data for exenatide and liraglutide could be included, that is, five RCTs and one cohort study. For exenatide the mean weight loss was -2.48 kg (95% Confidence Interval (CI) -5.12 to +0.64; p = 0.07), for liraglutide the mean weight loss was -4.70 kg (95% CI -4.85 to -4.56; p < 0.001). The mean change in BMI was -0.82 (95% CI -1.56 to -0.09; p = 0.03) in the exenatide groups and -1.52 (95% CI -1.83 to -1.22; p < 0.001) in the liraglutide groups. Exenatide and liraglutide did not adversely affect psychopathology. The most common adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. Conclusion: The GLP-1 agonists exenatide and liraglutide are promising drugs for inducing weight loss in patients with AIWG. The adverse effects are acceptable, and the addition of GLP-1 does not increase the severity of psychopathology. However, more research is needed.
Bottom line: GLP-1 agonists, particularly liraglutide, show significant weight loss benefits (4.7 kg) for patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain without worsening psychiatric symptoms.
Why it matters: Antipsychotic-induced weight gain is a major cause of medication non-adherence and cardiovascular morbidity in psychiatric patients. This provides evidence for a safe, effective pharmacological intervention when lifestyle modifications are insufficient.
⚠ Limited data available for only two GLP-1 agonists with small sample sizes, and the review included heterogeneous study designs.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Dosing levels of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder: A Nationwide cohort study on relapse risk and treatment safety
Lintunen J, Hamina A, Lähteenvuo M, Paljärvi T, Tanskanen A, Tiihonen J, Taipale H. Dosing levels of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers in bipolar disorder: A Nationwide cohort study on relapse risk and treatment safety. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Jan;151(1):81-91. doi: 10.1111/acps.13762. Epub 2024 Oct 2. PMID: 39355920; PMCID: PMC11608812.
View on PubMed ↗
Background: Finding effective treatment regimens for bipolar disorder is challenging, as many patients suffer from significant symptoms despite treatment. This study investigated the risk of relapse (psychiatric hospitalization) and treatment safety (non-psychiatric hospitalization) associated with different doses of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers in persons with bipolar disorder. Methods: Individuals aged 15-65 with bipolar disorder were identified from Finnish national health registers in 1996-2018. Studied antipsychotics included olanzapine, risperidone, quetiapine, aripiprazole; mood stabilizers lithium, valproic acid, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine. Medication use was divided into three time-varying dose categories: low, standard, and high. The studied outcomes were risk of psychiatric hospitalization (relapse) and the risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization (treatment safety). Stratified Cox regression in within-individual design was used. Results: The cohort included 60,045 individuals (mean age 41.7 years, SD 15.8; 56.4% female). Mean follow-up was 8.3 years (SD 5.8). Of antipsychotics, olanzapine and aripiprazole were associated with a decreased risk of relapse in low and standard doses, and risperidone in low dose. The lowest adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was observed for standard dose aripiprazole (aHR 0.68, 95% CI 0.57-0.82). Quetiapine was not associated with a decreased risk of relapse at any dose. Mood stabilizers were associated with a decreased risk of relapse in low and standard doses; lowest aHR was observed for standard dose lithium (aHR 0.61, 95% CI 0.56-0.65). Apart from lithium, high doses of antipsychotics and mood stabilizers were associated with an increased risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization. Lithium was associated with a decreased risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization in low (aHR 0.88, 95% CI 0.84-0.93) and standard doses (aHR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88). Conclusions: Standard doses of lithium and aripiprazole were associated with the lowest risk of relapse, and standard dose of lithium with the lowest risk of non-psychiatric hospitalization. Quetiapine was not associated with decreased risk of relapse at any dose.
Bottom line: Standard-dose lithium and aripiprazole showed the lowest relapse risk in bipolar disorder, while quetiapine showed no protective effect against relapse at any dose level.
Why it matters: This large-scale real-world data challenges common prescribing practices by showing quetiapine lacks relapse prevention benefits and confirms lithium's superior efficacy and safety profile. It provides evidence-based guidance for dose optimization in bipolar maintenance treatment.
⚠ Observational design cannot establish causation, and psychiatric hospitalization may not capture all clinically meaningful relapses.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
The risk of diabetes and HbA1c deterioration during antipsychotic drug treatment: A Danish two-cohort study among patients with first-episode schizophrenia
Madsen NM, Sørensen MA, Danielsen AA, Højlund M, Rohde C, Köhler-Forsberg O. The risk of diabetes and HbA1c deterioration during antipsychotic drug treatment: A Danish two-cohort study among patients with first-episode schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Jan;151(1):69-80. doi: 10.1111/acps.13760. Epub 2024 Oct 8. PMID: 39379169; PMCID: PMC11608811.
View on PubMed ↗
Background: Antipsychotics increase the risk of developing diabetes, but clinical trials are not generalizable with short follow-up, while observational studies often lack important information, particularly hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Methods: We followed two Danish cohorts with schizophrenia. First, using Danish nationwide registers, we identified all individuals diagnosed with first-episode schizophrenia (FES) between 1999 and 2019 (n = 31,856). Exposure was a redeemed prescription for an antipsychotic, and the outcome was diabetes, defined via hospital-based diagnosis and redeemed prescriptions for glucose-lowering drugs. Adjusted Cox regression calculated hazard rate ratios (HRR). Second, using data from the Central Denmark Region, we identified all individuals diagnosed with FES from October 2016 to September 2022 (n = 2671). Using a within-subject design, we analyzed the change in HbA1c during the 2 years after initiation of specific antipsychotics compared to the 2 years before. Results: In the nationwide cohort, 2543 (8.0%) individuals developed diabetes (incidence rate = 9.39 [95% CI = 9.03-9.76] per 1000 person-years). Antipsychotics, compared to periods without, were associated with an increased risk of developing diabetes (HRR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.75-2.38). We found a dose-response association, particularly for second-generation antipsychotics, and different risk rates for specific antipsychotics. In the Central Denmark Region cohort, a total of 9.2% developed diabetes but mean HbA1c levels remained stable at 37 mmol/mol during the 2 years after initiation of antipsychotic medication. Conclusion: This comprehensive real-world two-cohort study emphasizes that diabetes affects almost 10% of patients with FES. Antipsychotics increase this risk, while HbA1c deterioration requires longer treatment. These findings are important for clinicians and young patients with FES.
Bottom line: Antipsychotics double the risk of diabetes in first-episode schizophrenia patients, with nearly 10% developing diabetes, but HbA1c deterioration may take longer than 2 years to manifest.
Why it matters: This large real-world study provides specific diabetes risk estimates for antipsychotic prescribing decisions and emphasizes the need for long-term metabolic monitoring beyond the typical 2-year follow-up period.
⚠ The HbA1c analysis was limited to 2 years of follow-up, which may be insufficient to detect metabolic deterioration that develops more gradually.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Comparative efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy and antidepressant medication for adult depression: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis
Cohen ZD, Breunese J, Markowitz JC, Weitz ES, Hollon SD, Browne DT, Rucci P, Corda C, Menchetti M, Weissman MM, Bagby RM, Quilty LC, Blom MBJ, Altamura M, Zobel I, Schramm E, Gois C, Twisk JWR, Wienicke FJ, Cuijpers P, Driessen E. Comparative efficacy of interpersonal psychotherapy and antidepressant medication for adult depression: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2024 Nov 4;54(14):1-10. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001788. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39494789; PMCID: PMC11578913.
View on PubMed ↗
Interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and antidepressant medications are both first-line interventions for adult depression, but their relative efficacy in the long term and on outcome measures other than depressive symptomatology is unknown. Individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses can provide more precise effect estimates than conventional meta-analyses. This IPD meta-analysis compared the efficacy of IPT and antidepressants on various outcomes at post-treatment and follow-up (PROSPERO: CRD42020219891). A systematic literature search conducted May 1st, 2023 identified randomized trials comparing IPT and antidepressants in acute-phase treatment of adults with depression. Anonymized IPD were requested and analyzed using mixed-effects models. The prespecified primary outcome was post-treatment depression symptom severity. Secondary outcomes were all post-treatment and follow-up measures assessed in at least two studies. IPD were obtained from 9 of 15 studies identified (N = 1536/1948, 78.9%). No significant comparative treatment effects were found on post-treatment measures of depression (d = 0.088, p = 0.103, N = 1530) and social functioning (d = 0.026, p = 0.624, N = 1213). In smaller samples, antidepressants performed slightly better than IPT on post-treatment measures of general psychopathology (d = 0.276, p = 0.023, N = 307) and dysfunctional attitudes (d = 0.249, p = 0.029, N = 231), but not on any other secondary outcomes, nor at follow-up. This IPD meta-analysis is the first to examine the acute and longer-term efficacy of IPT v. antidepressants on a broad range of outcomes. Depression treatment trials should routinely include multiple outcome measures and follow-up assessments.
Bottom line: Interpersonal psychotherapy and antidepressants show equivalent efficacy for treating adult depression, with no significant differences in depression severity or social functioning at post-treatment or follow-up.
Why it matters: This provides high-quality evidence supporting IPT as equally effective to antidepressants, helping clinicians make informed treatment choices based on patient preferences, side effect profiles, and availability rather than efficacy concerns.
⚠ Follow-up data were limited and some secondary outcomes were assessed in small subsamples, potentially limiting the power to detect meaningful differences.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Intended And Unintended Outcomes After FDA Pediatric Antidepressant Warnings: A Systematic Review
Soumerai SB, Koppel R, Naci H, Madden JM, Fry A, Halbisen A, Angeles J, Koppel J, Rubin R, Lu CY. Intended And Unintended Outcomes After FDA Pediatric Antidepressant Warnings: A Systematic Review. Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Oct;43(10):1360-1369. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00263. PMID: 39374452.
View on PubMed ↗
Since 2003, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has warned that antidepressants may be associated with suicidal thoughts and behaviors among youth. An FDA advisory in 2003 and a black-box warning in 2005 focused on children and adolescents younger than age eighteen. The FDA expanded the black-box warning in 2007 to include young adults. Both warnings were intended to increase physician monitoring of suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Our systematic review identified thirty-four studies of depression and suicide-related outcomes after these warnings; eleven of these studies met research design criteria established to reduce biases. The eleven studies examined monitoring for suicidal thoughts and behaviors, physician visits for depression, depression diagnoses, psychotherapy visits, antidepressant treatment and use, and psychotropic drug poisonings (a proxy for suicide attempts) and suicide deaths. We assessed possible spillover to adults not targeted by the warnings. The one study that measured intended physician monitoring of suicidal thoughts and behaviors did not find evidence of an increase. Multiple studies found significant unintended reductions in mental health care after the warnings. After these reductions, there were marked increases in psychotropic drug poisonings and suicide deaths. These findings support reevaluation of risks and benefits of the FDA's black-box antidepressant warnings.
Bottom line: FDA black-box warnings for pediatric antidepressants reduced mental health care utilization but did not increase monitoring for suicidality, and were followed by increases in psychotropic drug poisonings and suicide deaths.
Why it matters: These findings suggest that FDA warnings may have caused more harm than benefit by reducing access to needed mental health treatment without improving safety monitoring, informing risk-benefit discussions with patients and families about antidepressant treatment.
⚠ The systematic review methodology limits causal inferences about the relationship between warnings and observed outcomes.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Emergency Department Visits Involving Hallucinogen Use and Risk of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder
Myran DT, Pugliese M, Xiao J, Kaster TS, Husain MI, Anderson KK, Fabiano N, Wong S, Fiedorowicz JG, Webber C, Tanuseputro P, Solmi M. Emergency Department Visits Involving Hallucinogen Use and Risk of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 13:e243532. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.3532. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39535804; PMCID: PMC11561722.
View on PubMed ↗
Importance: Interest in and use of hallucinogens has been increasing rapidly. While a frequently raised concern is that hallucinogens may be associated with an increased risk of psychosis, there are limited data on this association. Objectives: To examine whether individuals with an emergency department (ED) visit involving hallucinogen use have an increased risk of developing a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD). Design, settings, and participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study (January 2008 to December 2021) included all individuals aged 14 to 65 years in Ontario, Canada, with no history of psychosis (SSD or substance induced). Data were analyzed from May to August 2024. Exposure: An incident ED visit involving hallucinogen use. Main outcomes and measures: Diagnosis of SSD using a medical record-validated algorithm. Associations between ED visits involving hallucinogens and SSD were estimated using cause-specific adjusted hazard models. Individuals with an incident ED visit involving hallucinogens were compared with members of the general population (primary analysis) or individuals with ED visits involving alcohol or cannabis (secondary analysis). Results: The study included 9 244 292 individuals (mean [SD] age, 40.4 [14.7] years; 50.2% female) without a history of psychosis, with a median follow-up of 5.1 years (IQR, 2.3-8.6 years); 5217 (0.1%) had an incident ED visit involving hallucinogen use. Annual rates of incident ED visits involving hallucinogens were stable between 2008 and 2012 and then increased by 86.4% between 2013 and 2021 (3.4 vs 6.4 per 100 000 individuals). Individuals with ED visits involving hallucinogens had a greater risk of being diagnosed with an SSD within 3 years compared with the general population (age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 21.32 [95% CI, 18.58-24.47]; absolute proportion with SSD at 3 years, 208 of 5217 with hallucinogen use [3.99%] vs 13 639 of 9 239 075 in the general population [0.15%]). After adjustment for comorbid substance use and mental health conditions, individuals with hallucinogen ED visits had a greater risk of SSD compared with the general population (HR, 3.53; 95% CI, 3.05-4.09). Emergency department visits involving hallucinogens were associated with an increased risk of SSD within 3 years compared with ED visits involving alcohol (HR, 4.66; 95% CI, 3.82-5.68) and cannabis (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.21-1.80) in the fully adjusted model. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study, individuals with an ED visit involving hallucinogen use had a greater risk of developing an SSD compared with both the general population and with individuals with ED visits for other types of substances. These findings have important clinical and policy implications given the increasing use of hallucinogens and associated ED visits.
Bottom line: Emergency department visits involving hallucinogen use are associated with a 3.5-fold increased risk of developing schizophrenia spectrum disorder within 3 years, even after adjusting for other substance use and mental health conditions.
Why it matters: With hallucinogen use rapidly increasing and psychedelic therapy gaining acceptance, clinicians need to understand the psychosis risk profile when screening patients and making treatment decisions. This finding provides crucial safety data for risk-benefit assessments in both recreational and therapeutic contexts.
⚠ The study only captures severe hallucinogen reactions requiring emergency care, which may not represent the broader population of hallucinogen users.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
The D*Phase-study: Comparing short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder in a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial
Miggiels M, Ten Klooster P, Beekman A, Bremer S, Dekker J, Janssen C, van Dijk MK. The D*Phase-study: Comparing short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy and cognitive behavioural therapy for major depressive disorder in a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. J Affect Disord. 2024 Oct 30;371:344-351. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.10.122. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39486646.
View on PubMed ↗
Background: Given both the large volume and manifold preferences of patients with depression, the availability of various effective treatments is important. Psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) has received less research in comparison to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for major depressive disorder (MDD). This study aimed to establish whether short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) is non-inferior to CBT in the treatment of MDD. Methods: A non-inferiority trial was conducted in a Dutch mental health setting, with 290 patients randomised to receive 16 sessions of either CBT or SPSP, over eight weeks. Primary outcome was depressive symptom severity assessed using the self-rated Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). The non-inferiority margin was prespecified as a - 5 post-treatment difference on the IDS-SR. Secondary outcome measures were functional impairment caused by symptoms assessed using the Sheehan disability scale (SDS), and wellbeing measured by the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF). Results: Both intention-to-treat (baseline-adjusted mean difference 1.62, 95 % CI -1.82 to 5.05) and per-protocol analyses (mean difference 2.54; 95 % CI -0.63 to 5.72) showed SPSP to be non-inferior to CBT in reducing depressive symptoms. SPSP showed slightly but significantly higher remission rates and wellbeing scores. Limitations: Patients opting for other therapies or medication did not take part in the trial. Follow-up measures or clinician-rated questionnaires were not included. Conclusions: The findings support SPSP as a viable treatment option for MDD, expanding the available choices for patients and broadening treatment options.
Bottom line: Short-term psychodynamic supportive psychotherapy (SPSP) is non-inferior to CBT for major depression, with slightly higher remission rates, providing evidence for offering patients a choice between these therapeutic approaches.
Why it matters: This expands evidence-based treatment options for depression beyond CBT, which is important given patient preferences vary and some may respond better to psychodynamic approaches. The finding of slightly higher remission rates with SPSP suggests it may be particularly effective for some patients.
⚠ The study lacked follow-up data to assess durability of treatment effects and excluded patients who preferred medication or other therapies, limiting generalizability.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Depression and the risk of fibromyalgia syndrome: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study
Ma X, Sun J, Geng R, Zhao Y, Xu W, Jiang Y, Zhao L, Li Y. Depression and the risk of fibromyalgia syndrome: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 12;15:1282172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1282172. PMID: 39600790; PMCID: PMC11588703.
View on PubMed ↗
Background: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a common illness with a wide range of symptoms, mainly manifested by unexplained chronic systemic musculoskeletal pain, sleep disorders and fatigue, sometimes accompanied by cognitive impairment, psychiatric symptoms and autonomic dysfunction. Previous studies have indicated a correlation between depression and the risk of FM; however, it remains uncertain whether this association reflects a causal relationship. Methods: We evaluated the etiological association between the genetically predicted depression and the risk of developing FM by conducting a two-sample Mendelian Randomization (MR) study. The data on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) related to depression were obtained from the UK Biobank (UKB) and the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium (PGC) of White British European ancestry, and the data for FM were from the 5th release of the FinnGen study. We adopted the Inverse Variance Weighted (IVW) approach as the principal standard. In order to detect the existence of horizontal pleiotropy and heterogeneity, we adopted the MR-Egger approach as the sensitivity analysis Results: In our MR analysis, 42 depression-related variants were identified as valid instrumental variables (IVs). The IVW approach's results manifest that there is no etiologic causality between genetically predicted depression and the risk of FM (odds ratio [OR]: 1.673, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.852-3.287, P = 0.135). The study did not find any significant heterogeneities or horizontal pleiotropies (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that there is no significant genetic evidence linking depression to an increased risk of FM. However, further research is necessary to investigate the potential relationship and underlying mechanisms between depression and the risk of FM.
Bottom line: This Mendelian randomization study found no causal relationship between genetically predicted depression and fibromyalgia risk, despite observational studies showing association.
Why it matters: This challenges the assumption that depression causally leads to fibromyalgia and suggests their frequent co-occurrence may be due to shared environmental factors, reverse causation, or common underlying pathways rather than depression directly causing fibromyalgia.
⚠ The study only examined genetic variants from European populations, which may limit generalizability to other ethnic groups.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Prediction of borderline personality disorder based on childhood trauma with the mediating role of experiential avoidance
Jiang B. Prediction of borderline personality disorder based on childhood trauma with the mediating role of experiential avoidance. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 6;15:1382012. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1382012. PMID: 39568759; PMCID: PMC11576193.
View on PubMed ↗
Introduction: Traits of borderline personality disorder are important for the determination of the prognosis of mental illnesses and in evaluating risks of negativity as well as impulsivity. But, there is a lack of information about the distribution characteristics of borderline personality disorder traits and symptoms within clinical groups. The goal of the current study was to predict borderline personality disorder based on childhood trauma, using experiential avoidance as a mediator. Methods: All male patients hospitalized in local psychiatric health centers with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder comprised the statistical population of the current study. The number of 60 patients were selected by the purposeful sampling method. The questionnaire included the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ), the Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire (AAQ-II), and the Borderline Personality Disorder Symptoms (BSL-23). Results and discussion: The results demonstrated that there is a considerable and positive relationship between childhood trauma and experiential avoidance (r = 0.711, p< 0.01). In the mediating model, childhood trauma had significant direct predictive effects on borderline personality disorder (β = 0.546, p< 0.01). Also, between childhood trauma and BPD, experienced avoidance acts as a moderating factor. (β = 0.304, p< 0.01).
Bottom line: Childhood trauma predicts borderline personality disorder symptoms, with experiential avoidance serving as a significant mediator in this relationship among hospitalized male patients.
Why it matters: This validates the trauma-BPD connection and suggests that targeting experiential avoidance (the tendency to avoid difficult internal experiences) could be a specific therapeutic focus when treating BPD patients with trauma histories.
⚠ Very small sample size (n=60), all-male sample from single center limits generalizability, and cross-sectional design prevents causal inferences.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
How Should We Expand Access to Psychedelics While Maintaining an Environment of Peace and Safety?
Verne Z, Zabinski J. How Should We Expand Access to Psychedelics While Maintaining an Environment of Peace and Safety? AMA J Ethics. 2024 Nov 1;26(11):E868-874. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2024.868. PMID: 39495644.
View on PubMed ↗
Psychedelics have long been used by individuals seeking peace and a sense of wellness. This article examines widespread adoption of ketamine as a proxy for psychedelics. For ketamine, there is a need to protect vulnerable persons from exploitation that should be balanced against risks of hypermedicalization. This article suggests strategies for striking such a balance, including by carefully differentiating between persons with psychiatric illnesses, such as treatment-resistant depression, who could benefit from psychedelics, and persons using psychedelics for peace and wellness under careful guidance.
Bottom line: As psychedelic access expands, clinicians should distinguish between treating psychiatric illness (like treatment-resistant depression) versus wellness/spiritual use, with appropriate safeguards against exploitation while avoiding hypermedicalization.
Why it matters: The growing availability of psychedelics like ketamine requires psychiatrists to understand appropriate clinical applications versus wellness uses, and to develop frameworks for safe, ethical access that protect vulnerable patients from exploitation.
⚠ This is an ethics viewpoint article without empirical data on implementation strategies or outcomes.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed
Advancing ketamine in the treatment hierarchy for refractory depression
Nigam K, King F 4th, Espi Forcen F. Advancing ketamine in the treatment hierarchy for refractory depression. Br J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 25:1-3. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2024.217. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39449651.
View on PubMed ↗
Evidence indicates that ketamine is highly effective, has a lower side effect profile and is better tolerated compared to many augmentation strategies for refractory depression. This, combined with data on psychiatric treatment outcome mediators, suggests that earlier intervention with ketamine could improve outcomes for patients suffering from refractory depression.
Bottom line: Ketamine may be more effective and better tolerated than traditional augmentation strategies for treatment-resistant depression, suggesting it should be considered earlier in the treatment algorithm rather than as a last resort.
Why it matters: This challenges current treatment hierarchies that typically reserve ketamine for late-stage treatment failures, potentially allowing clinicians to offer more effective interventions sooner and reduce patient suffering from prolonged treatment resistance.
⚠ This appears to be a commentary or viewpoint piece rather than original research, limiting the strength of evidence for changing clinical practice.
AI-assisted, committee-reviewed